Great Jack, welcome aboard!

It's pretty easy to tie with as normal hair. Haven't had much luck
spinning it yet, but then again, I'm not a great spinner!

Updated list:

1 - Ken Staples - pattern TBD (but it could be a clouser...)
2 - Mark Delaney (please confirm)
3 - Larry Johnson (please confirm)
4 - Jack Morris - pattern TBD
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 -
10 -
11 -
12 -


On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:53:42 -0500, Jack Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never used the stuff but I'll try. Should be interesting. Count me in
> 
> Jack
> 
> "The worst day on the stream is infinitely better than the best day at
> the office."
> 
> 
> On Friday, March 4, 2005, at 03:47  PM, Ken Staples wrote:
> 
> > Hi Everybody,
> >
> > With all of the recent discussions around synthetic dusters as a
> > material, as well as the article on them in Fly Tyer, I thought a swap
> > might be in order. I thought we'd keep it pretty simple and give
> > people ample time to experiment with them, especially if you haven't
> > used it before. FYI - These are the synthetic/"all purpose"/static
> > dusters you can find at Dollar Stores, discount stores, and the home
> > sections of supermarkets and big chain stores. Here's an example of a
> > pattern tied with it:
> >
> > http://www.danica.com/flytier/wlutz/duster_minnow.htm
> >
> > Swap Guidelines (more details later):
> >
> > Due Date: May 7th, 2005 (Saturday). This should give people time to
> > experiement and tie.
> >
> > Pattern: Anything you want as long as the primary material is duster
> > fibers. You can do an all duster pattern as well.
> >
> > Other info: Full details will be sent out off list when the swap is
> > full.
> >
> > OPTION: If there's interest we could do a "co-op" and include some
> > material with each fly for others to try out. We can discuss this.
> >
> > # of tyers: 12
> >
> > 1 - Ken Staples
> > 2 - Mark Delaney (please confirm)
> > 3 - Larry Johnson (please confirm)
> > 4 -
> > 5 -
> > 6 -
> > 7 -
> > 8 -
> > 9 -
> > 10 -
> > 11 -
> > 12 -
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Ken
> >
> >
> 
>

Reply via email to