Fly-fishing isn't just fishing... the water has to be analyzed.
Fly-tying isn't just tying... the fly has to be analyzed.

If something requires analyzing, then it should be ANALYZED!!

(I should be penalized.)

/Nick




-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För
Charlie Bonner
Skickat: den 5 maj 2006 23:13
Till: [email protected]
Ämne: Re: [VFB] Chilli Pepper Classification- scientific


I think that may be the most I have ever read about a Wooly pepper bugger 
chilied.




>From: "Niclas Runarsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [VFB] Chilli Pepper Classification- scientific
>Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 22:57:00 +0200
>
>Well,
>what makes a WB a Pepper? what makes a Pepper a Chilly Pepper?
>
>I asume that the bead head and the red / orange thread, which forms the 
>neck below the bead are necessary to make it a Pepper.
>
>Whaddayall think?
>**************************************************
>
>The first thing that comes to my mind is the tinsel chenille (flash 
>chenille, crystal chenille or whatever the manufacturer has named it 
>as) instead of the regular chenille. Next thing will be the 8 strands 
>of crystal flash in the tail.
>
>I, personally, don't think the bead should matter. I mean a bead on a
>Hare's
>Ear Nymph didn't make it seize to be a Hare's Ear Nymph... it just got to 
>be
>a Beadheaded HEN. So a Woolly Bugger with a bead should just make it a
>Beadheaded Woolly Bugger.
>
>So, to be scientific about then (thinking in parallel with what I 
>learned from herpetology studies): My own Black Peppers have all the 
>ingredients that the true Chili Pepper ('Chili pepprus pepprus') has, 
>only in black, which I think makes them 'Peppers'. Really just the same 
>species spreading to other habitats and mother nature creates color 
>adaptations. Sometimes these will be refered as subspecies ('Chili 
>pepprus blackentrix') and sometimes they will be refered only as a 
>color variant of the species. When I tied my Grizzly Peppers, the 
>evolution step was more radical, since now we're talking a different 
>kind of marabou feathers... and an actual physical change is good 
>enough to make them a subspecies (Chili pepprus grizzlii).
>
>Now Ian has tied a variant of my Black Pepper using 'black chenille 
>with just a touch of flash', chenille/flash blend... so now it gets 
>more interesting. If my Black Pepper is one of those "color variants", 
>then Ian's fly (with a PHYSICAL material change), would be a subspecies 
>to the Chili Pepper and a "brother" to the Grizzly Pepper... maybe a 
>'Chili pepprus chenastes'. But if my Black Pepper made it to 
>subspecies, the rock might start to roll. Ian's variant might actually 
>break the family into two. I don't have a PhD, but I know this has 
>happened to some snakes. A new snake variant is found and they cheer 
>"YES!!! ANOTHER SUBSPECIES!!!"... but then they discover that this 
>isn't correct. The snake has turned out to be closer
>to an already existing subspeices than it is to the actual top species. 
>They
>won't give it a fourth name. They won't place it as a separate species,
>since it's closer to another snake's subspecies than the true species.
>So...... the already existing subspecies will be put as a new species, with
>the new snake as it's subspecies. So my Black Pepper gets kicked out of the
>Pepper family and gets named 'Chili leechus leechus' and Ian's fly gets
>named 'Chili leechus chenastes'.
>
>And now we enter the comic side of the scientific side. I've heard or 
>read something about the Chili Pepper first started as some kind of 
>joke. Someone refused to tie a bugger on the tippet and this, or a 
>variant, was given to him. Something like that. Obviously this will be 
>hard proof that the Chili Pepper is a younger species than the WB. The 
>difference between them are merely the flash material and the bead.
>Evolution grabbed hold of the bugger and turned it into a Chili Pepper,
>which developed subspecies of its own. Ian's fly made it too crowded so the
>fly I tied as a subspecies got kicked to a new branch on the tree. Nature
>forms and adapts and species are born, just like it has always been...
>except in this case. The Peppers had left chenille a long time ago, but 
>when
>Ian chose chenille/flash blend for the body of his fly 'Chili leechus
>chenastes', his fly is actually taking the 'Chili leechus' family back to
>where it started... Buggers. Nature going in reverse!!! And since my fly is
>now on top of that branch, I will be the one taking the fall for starting
>it.
>
>...and this while the 'Chili pepprus' family advances and advances.  
>:o(
>
>/Nick
>
>






Reply via email to