Well, as a final aside...and I won't continue to argue
the point because that's not what I'm about, you are
right about at least the fact that we have the right
to disagre.  That's what I respect about people who
have passion about their convictions.
I know what I aspire to.  But over the years I have
released a ton of fish and am happy to say I did so. 
One was a 30" Rainbow on the Taylor, another a 27"
pure Cutt and last year a nice Stripped Marlin in
Cabo.  I hope others catch the same fish and have
(had) the same feelings of awe that I did when I
caught these amazing fish.  I smile when I see pics of
all of them.  

Thanks for the discussion!

Rob
--- DonO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "rob poutre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [VFB] To release or not to release?
> Shakespeare- was Brown Trout
> 
> 
>  I have always advocated eating what you catch as
> long as it were within legal and 
> 
> moral guidelines. 
> 
> That's the hypocracy of it all.
> Rob
> 
> Rob,
> 
> With the background you have, you should also know
> that 'moral guidelines' are not in any fishing
> manual, at least one I've ever received.  We each
> create them (morals) for ourselves.  But can we
> enforce our morals on others?  Of course, we have
> the right to disagree, as we do with any moral or
> ethical decision of another person.  But that's all
> we can do- disagree.  Only if Jack said he'd never
> kill a fish as a trophy is he a hypocrite.  And then
> it would be only his problem, not mine, as the catch
> was legal.  He has the right to change his mind,
> unless he used his 'position' to judge others who
> had done what he did.  I know flyfishermen who
> believe it's moral and ethical to keep and eat every
> fish caught, and quit fishing when the legal creel
> limit is reached.  They believe torturing a fish for
> fun is not a sport.  Maybe they have something.
> 
> Here we have what is legally defined as 'trophy
> water'.  That's not 'photograph and measure'
> trophies.  That's take it home, give it to a
> taxidermist, and make a trophy out of it.  The limit
> says "one fish over 22".  It doesn't mention fish of
> superior genetics, just larger size.  Example: A
> smaller trout, possibly having superior genetics for
> general survival, was eaten by a trophy-size fish
> that was released.  We'll never know.  The moral and
> ethical debate is outside the law.
> 
> Again, I won't pass judgement on Jack, as I wouldn't
> want PETA passing judgement one me.
> 
> Respectfully Again,
> DonO


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to