Tie it or toss it and forget it.

One already have too much to stress over already without stressing over a
single hook.

More important is to set a date of when you amnd the family will have
recuped enough to hit the water and use the ones you tied. Yep, they have to
have a period of recuperation also due to their concern for you.

Jim

On 4/7/07, Chuck Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Garry: I'm NOT a pro tier.. and barely an amateur LOL.. But I guess you
could buy , say 600 hooks (24 packs) and tie 100 sets of 6 LOL...or 50
sets
of 12, or 200 packs of 3... Chuckles

----- Original Message -----
From: "Garry V. Wiles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 9:32 PM
Subject: [VFB] Hot Dogs and Hooks


> Listers,
>
> OK, this is ON TOPIC and goes along with the subject lines.  As I stated
> in my reply to Jimmy and his snowfall, I bought materials and hooks on
> Thursday with intentions of tieing a bunch during my up and coming
hernia
> operation and the down time afterwards.  Today started some warm up and
> I've tied 2 dozen size 10 Red Tag variants out of a box of 25
hooks.  (see
> my tie in to hot dogs - dogs in packs of 10 and buns in packs of 8).  I
> don't normally sit down and tie a box of the same or similar patterns
that
> often and I don't really notice the extra hook.  But TODAY, I now have 4
> sets of 1/2 doz each of the variants, leaving me the 1 hook left
over.  My
> question is for the bulk or professional tiers -- what do you end up
doing
> w/the extra hook?  Normally, if I were tieing for someone, I'd give them
> an extra fly or keep that one for myself as a pattern; but the ones for
> today were pretty much for my and my kids' use.  Now I have 1 pattern
with
> an uneven amount.  This lack of equality gnaws at my personal obsessive
> compulsive disorder and is hard to tolerate - next time I might try the
5
> patterns of 5, since that goes evenly into boxes of 25 and/or 50.
> HOWEVER, it goes against the 3,6,12 quantities of tieing a pattern.
>
> HELP!!!
>
>
> Garry
>


Reply via email to