Hi, Sincerely, i think you will run into problem. Even more for gaming. For example, you load a game, or use hardly your 12 cores.
Be sure that your wife will start to have lags / stutter and will scream at you, like old time of gaming on slow bandwith :) Keep cores separated for both vm. One have 2 cores, the other one 2. and 1 for the host. Think that, for best performance, it is better that the host doesn't schedule at all the cpu linked to the guest! -- Deldycke Quentin On 26 January 2016 at 11:09, Jonathan Scruggs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a 6 core Haswell Processor with Hyper threading. What if I passed > in all 6 cores with the hyper thread cores to the guest. When I am doing > stuff on the guest I am not running anything on the host. Would I need to > reverse pin the cores, so Core 0 on the host would be core 15 on the guest, > so in theory Core 0 would have more host processes on it? > > My thinking is that the CPU scheduler on the host would allocate the > threads in an efficient manner. > > However, I want to add a second windows guest for my wife and both windows > used at the same time for gaming, not the latest games. Would both guests > with all 12 cores passed through be provisioned right be the scheduler of > the host? Or would I run into serious trouble? > > Thanks, > Jon > > _______________________________________________ > vfio-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/vfio-users > >
_______________________________________________ vfio-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/vfio-users
