No, I suspect it was to be more appropriate for broadcast applications, which 
usually have more frequent intra for channel switching.

Back in the day, 1/2 second or 12 frame GOPs were deemed essential for MPEG-2 
digital TV to mimic analogue switching times, but I think that is long gone - 
now audio is switched first and then the video when possible, to give an 
illusion of immediacy. I think low bit rate channels could easily have intra 
periods of 2 or 3 seconds.

I agree it's short for streaming applications, and could be longer. However, 
including a decent proportion of intra in the metrics is probably good.

Regards

Thomas

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Daede [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 10:20 PM
To: Thomas Davies (thdavies)
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [video-codec] Test sequences, automated and otherwise

Do you know if the 1-second keyframe interval was also for reasons of compute 
time? (It allows each GOP to be encoded in parallel). It unfortunately seems a 
bit short for many streaming applications, and also prevents rate control from 
being tested.

At the moment, I run all codecs with rate control on in their constant quality 
mode. Perhaps this is not the right thing to do.

On 03/02/2015 02:52 AM, Thomas Davies wrote:
> The "Class A" JCT-VC sequences were originated at 4k or 8k and cropped 
> down for reasons of compute time. The 8k-originated ones (Nebuta and
> SteamLocomotive) are very noisy and were shot with an early camera and 
> sensor. There wasn't much good 4k at the time HEVC started, and it 
> would certainly be good to get more.
> 
> regards
> 
> Thomas
> 
> On 25/02/15 17:44, Thomas Daede wrote:
>> The JCT-VC test set only includes three clips for video conferencing, 
>> which I don't think is sufficient. It also specifies a intra frame 
>> period of 1 second, which is not reasonable. It does not feature any 
>> 2160p test sequences either, which is a bit strange.
>> _______________________________________________ video-codec mailing 
>> list [email protected] 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
> 

_______________________________________________
video-codec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec

Reply via email to