On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Timothy B. Terriberry <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) wrote: > >> Adam Roach <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I propose clarifying by changing the first milestone to be "Requirements >>> and evaluation criteria to IESG..." >>> >> >> Works for me. >> >> Also fine to keep the final milestone for the testing doc for now. We can >> revisit once there, which also gives time to see how opus handles this >> (currently no supply or demand interest). >> > > Both sound fine to me. > > Any objection to adding the deliverable for a reference implementation? > Here's some proposed text: > > "3. Source code for a reference implementation that includes both an > encoder and a decoder." > > +1 for adding source code ref-impl. > > _______________________________________________ > video-codec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec >
_______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
