Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-netvc-00-01: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-netvc/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- As a sitting TSV AD, I applaud "It should include, but may not be limited to, the ability to support fast and flexible congestion control and rate adaptation, ..." Thanks to the group for going there. This seems uber important. I'm balloting Yes with heartburn, based on this text: "In developing the codec specification, the WG may consider information concerning old prior art or the results of research indicating royalty-free availability of particular techniques." What I had assumed based on the BOF is that NETVC intends to use non-traditional techniques to (I'm quoting from the "DAALA coding tools and progress" slides at the BOF) "Replace major codec building blocks with fundamentally different technology "Be sufficiently different from existing approaches to avoid large swaths of patents" as DAALA has done - at least, I assumed that was the point of showing these slides at the BOF. Am I misunderstanding, or is NETVC back to using traditional approaches, where looking at old prior art matters more? I agree with Martin's initial Discuss, and I mention that to thank you for the change into "seek cross-area review". I do see that as stronger than "liase with". _______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
