> These two paragraphs serve slightly different purposes. The first one > cites BCP 79 as a means to explain how the WG may consider the IPR > landscape in developing the codec. The second one then further > articulates what BCP 79 says and its limitation in terms of the > outcome of the WG. These are not quite the same thing. > > Given that the first paragraph resulted from consultation with Jorge > and Scott as mentioned in the thread regarding Barry's block, that the > citation to BCP 79 there was an important addition, and that the > second paragraph is taken directly from the CODEC charter, I'm > hesitant to make more edits to any of this language.
For what it's worth, I agree. Barry _______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
