Or "comparable or better"
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 May 2015 at 11:05, Alissa Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: > > s/Is competitive/Is competitive (in the sense of having comparable > > performance)/ > > — This was mentioned by Stephen and also seems warranted given the LS we > > received. > > Why not? > > Has comparable performance to current video codecs in widespread use. > > _______________________________________________ > video-codec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec >
_______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
