+1
On Jul 7, 2015, at 5:00 PM, Mohammed Raad <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I agree, I don't see a reason for supporting interlace in future video codecs. On 7 Jul 2015 21:29, "Timothy B. Terriberry" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thomas Daede wrote: Arguments against interlacing: - Requires extra features to encode efficiently. HEVC has dropped MBAFF, libvpx has never supported interlacing. - Moves deinterlacer complexity to the encoder, which is an easier place to offload complexity - There are no internet-connected interlaced displays in common usage I'll add one more: brings into play a large amount of additional IPR to avoid. _______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec _______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
_______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
