On 08/12/2015 12:15 PM, Raphael Canut wrote: > 2015-08-12 20:23 GMT+02:00 Timothy B. Terriberry <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > > Thanks for the contribution. There are several ways to go from here. > > One thing that would be interesting to know would be the performance > compared to Daala and Thor. I would suggest working with Thomas > Daede <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> to make that happen. > > That's a good idea, but keep in mind that the NHW codec is optimized for > neatness (and sharpness), so results for PSNR and SSIM are not good > (there are more "errors").For now, the best way I have found to evaluate > the NHW codec is to visually evaluate it.... It is also now optimized > for mid/normal compression, there are no high compression settings... > It's still experimental!
We do have a couple of other metrics that value detail retention more, such as PSNR-HVS and FASTSSIM in our code tree. To be able to hook your codec up to arewecompressedyet, it needs to support YUV 4:2:0 input and output in the y4m format. _______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
