Apparently Andrey's comments got caught in gmail's filters (thanks, DMARC), so make sure to check the archive if you didn't get them:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec/current/msg00499.html On 08/04/2016 02:18 PM, Adam Roach wrote: > [as chair] > > NETVC participants: > > We would like to start a two-week working group last call on the codec > requirements document: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netvc-requirements-02 > > All working group participants are encouraged to carefully read the > document and comment on the mailing list -- even something simple like > "I have reviewed the document and believe it is in good shape" is helpful. > > I'll also note that the question as to whether we request publication of > this document as an RFC is still open. As part of this last call, please > indicate whether you believe such publication would be of value. If we > do not request publication, we will instead announce a document freeze > at some point after the end of WGLC (roughly, the amount of time > typically between end of WGLC and publication request). > > Thanks! > > /a > > _______________________________________________ > video-codec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec _______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
