Hi Jonatan,

That is correct, the working group can consider new candidate proposals. It 
would be preferable if proponents can determine if their candidates can be 
merged, but if that is not possible, you are also correct that a comparative 
evaluation would be necessary.

Best regards,
Mo

From: Jonatan Samuelsson 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, January 4, 2018 at 6:59 AM
To: mzanaty <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [video-codec] IETF 100 NETVC meeting minutes


Dear Mo, all,

Thank you for the quick response. I am not really familiar with the working 
group's processes and ways of working, but I understand from your response that 
the group is still open to consider new candidate proposals. I assume at some 
point there will be a (final) evaluation to determine which candidate best 
meets the requirements chartered for the working group?

Best Regards Jonatan

[Divideon]
            Creators of xvc.io<https://xvc.io/>

Jonatan Samuelsson
Co-founder and CEO
Telephone: +467 21 88 21 69
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.divideon.com

On 2018-01-03 06:11, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) wrote:
Hi Jonatan,

The milestones for a codec specification and reference implementation require a 
single candidate, not multiple. So far, we do not have a single, merged 
codebase or specification submitted as a candidate for these milestones. The 
Daala and Thor codebases which have been submitted as candidates are available 
in public repositories, but have not been merged into a single candidate. Those 
teams have also been working in another public repository (AOM AV1) to merge 
their designs, but that codebase has not been proposed as a candidate codec by 
any proponent to date.

Best regards,
Mo


From: Jonatan Samuelsson 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 8:10 AM
To: mzanaty <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [video-codec] IETF 100 NETVC meeting minutes


Dear Mo, all,

Thanks for sharing the notes from the NETVC session at IETF 100.

I have a question related to the milestones, and in particular the "Submit 
reference implementation to IESG" and "Submit codec specification to IESG". It 
is noted that the milestone dates will be updated to 2018. Is it possible to 
follow the work being performed related to the completion of these two 
activities? Is the development being performed in a publicly available 
repository?

Best Regards Jonatan

[Divideon]
            Creators of xvc.io<https://xvc.io/>

Jonatan Samuelsson
Co-founder and CEO
Telephone: +467 21 88 21 69
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.divideon.com

On 2017-11-16 07:42, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) wrote:
The meeting minutes for the NETVC session at IETF 100 in Singapore have been 
posted to:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-100-netvc/

Please review and send any clarifications or corrections by Nov 27.

Thanks to Nathan Egge for taking these notes.

Mo




_______________________________________________
video-codec mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec


_______________________________________________
video-codec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec

Reply via email to