Hello, If it could be of interest, here are new speed measurement for -l13 very high compression setting which are not the same.
For x265 (HEVC), I use BPG codec, and this time I use -m 0 setting which uses the fastest encoding setting of x265.I run the .exe 10x times and I pick the best scores. So here are the timings at -l13 very high compression: Encode time: x265 (BPG -m 0): 80ms NHW: 20ms Decode time: x265 (BPG): 90ms NHW: 10ms So with an equivalent level of optimization (x4-5, multithreading, SIMD,...), the NHW Project is 80/20x5=20x faster to encode and 90/10x5=45x faster to decode than x265 (optimized HEVC)! Yes, 45x faster to decode than x265 at very high compression!, this would really save on battery life for mobile devices! I wanted to let you know, the industry, about these performance if you could consider the NHW Project. Else also, with the new improvements I finally find the NHW Project competitive with x265 (HEVC) on nearly 90%-95% of the images I have tested at -l13 very high compression, because it has more neatness. I will continue to go down to very high compression, but it is not that easy, anyway you can have a first idea with -l13 very high compression setting on my demo page ( http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ ). Many thanks for your attention! Cheers, Raphael Canut
_______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
