Re: [V4L] Re: v4l2 + select() + read()

[Ben Bridgwater]

Gerd Knorr wrote:

> The current v4l2 specs says drivers should support non-blocking reads but
> may refuse partial reads if it is "inefficient to implement".  This
> combination simply doesn't make sense to me.  IMHO we should pick one
> of the more useful combinations:  make partial reads mandatory or drop
> non-blocking I/O support for read().

If this is the choice, I'd much rather have the non-blocking read() with
select support, as this seems much more useful (for IO integration). I
can't see the use for partial reads.

Ben



_______________________________________________
Video4linux-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list