Billy Biggs wrote: > Torgeir Veimo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > >>> Reversing this process involves identifying field repeat patterns >>>and editing the frames I output to represent the original 24fps >>>stream. My algorithm is two-pass, and I handle phase transitions >>>better than anything else I can find. Yay! >>> >>Better than descaler as well? If so, they would be interested in your >>algorithm. >> > > Unfortunately, my algorithm is two-pass, so it is non-realtime. As > such they wouldn't be interested, but VirtualDub would (I emailed that > guy but he hasn't got back to me, plus, I just 'finished' my alg a few > days ago). > > I have a realtime algorithm I use in my DVD player (movietime, > www.sf.net/projects/movietime), but I haven't compared results with > dscaler's.
How many frames do you need? I think descaler buffers as many frames as the algorithm needs. Or is the processing power too high for realtime? It would be nice to standardize on a module api for deinterlacers under linux, both for pctv deinterlacers and dvd deinterlacers. -- -Torgeir _______________________________________________ Video4linux-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
