On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 04:59, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > > The original vic did not - but newer versions do.  eg:
> > > http://www-mice.cs.ucl.ac.uk/multimedia/software/vic/
> >  
> >     AFAIR there are two H263 codecs one is H.263+ TMN11 (insanely slow) and
> >  other H.263v1 very outdated. AFAIR one of this is code from Gerd Knor.
> 
> I never wrote a H.263+ codec from scratch, I just hacked the TMN stuff
> (years ago).  Thus it is basically all TMN ...

        I didn't know which one did you implemented, but I know that H.263+ is
just TMN11...
        BTW how dificult was the wrapper ? Did you have to implement RTP
payload by yourself or this was already in the code ?
        Sometimes I think it would be nice to have H.263+ real time on VIC.

> TMN is (was?) the reference implementation.  Purpose of that encoder was
> to check out the how good H.263 compression works, it isn't designed for
> speed.
 
> Not sure what the openh323 / gnomemeeting people use these days.

        AFAIK they don use H.263 at all ....

-- 
Juanjo sin .sig :(



_______________________________________________
Video4linux-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list

Reply via email to