Tuukka Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1. > Is V4L2_PIX_FMT_HI240 same format as VIDEO_PALETTE_HI240? > (sounds like stupid question, but it's stated nowhere and i don't want to > guess. And if it is, why doesn't v4l_compat.c know it?)
Yes, it is the same. But nearly nobody actually uses that. Feel free to mail patches against v4l1-compat.c (latest version is in 2.5.x kernels or http://bytesex.org/patches 2.4.x kernel patches). > 2. > Are V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB555X and V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB565X exactly same as > V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB555 and V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB565 but the bits in the 16-bit > words reversed wordwise (or bytewise)? The X versions are just byte swapped. > 3. > Is V4L2_PIX_FMT_NV12 and NV21 same as M$ fourcc 'NV12': IIRC yes. > 4. > Is there M$ fourcc code for V4L2_PIX_FMT_WNVA? Don't know. Gerd -- Weil die späten Diskussionen nicht mal mehr den Rotwein lohnen. -- Wacholder in "Melanie" -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
