Reinoud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gerd Knorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Latest snapshot should accept V4L2_FIELD_ALTERNATE. I hav't tested
> > that too much through, feel free to drop me a note if something
> > doesn't work ...
>
> Way cool man! Tried it immediately, it works but has some problems:
>
> - Strange varying latency. Bottom fields seem to take 60ms to
> capture, this is what gets measured on my system:
Well, the currently implemented stuff is the easy part of the problem:
split data into two buffers. It doesn't wake up at field rate yet,
this is still at frame rate. Thats why the odd latencies ...
> - VIDIOC_DQBUF fails when using 4 buffers (which VIDIOC_REQBUFS
> accepts!).
is ->count on return still 4? The driver is allowed to change those
values ...
Gerd
--
Weil die späten Diskussionen nicht mal mehr den Rotwein lohnen.
-- Wacholder in “Melanie”
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
