> We are wondering if anyone could say whether this may be the result of the > video4linux interface on the driver side, or the video4linux coding on the > VIC side? Maybe someone else has experience in a similar situation? V4L itself does no data processing for the image. So I guess they are using different modes/coding setups in the app. _______________________________________________ Video4linux-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
- [V4L] Quailty of VIC image with bttv James MacLean
- Re: [V4L] Quailty of VIC image with bttv Alan Cox
- Re: [V4L] Quailty of VIC image with bttv Artur Skawina
- Re: [V4L] Quailty of VIC image with bttv Ragga Muffin
- Re: [V4L] Quailty of VIC image with bttv James MacLean
- Re: [V4L] Quailty of VIC image with bttv Moses
- Re: [V4L] Quailty of VIC image with btt... James MacLean
- Re: [V4L] Quailty of VIC image with bttv Jacek Popławski
- Re: [V4L] Quailty of VIC image with bttv Juan J. Sierralta P.
- Re: [V4L] Quailty of VIC image with bttv James MacLean
- Re: [V4L] Quailty of VIC image with btt... Juan J. Sierralta P.
