> --- In [email protected], "Pete Prodoehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, if 'we' includes 'me' who has had to deal with poorly formed XML
> > called RSS, then we should care because it's a pain in the ass to deal
> > with RSS that should be XML but is not really XML...
>
> What makes you think that people won't output crap Atom that breaks
> your unforgiving xml parser?
The Atom spec is more clear than the RSS spec, so it's easier to
produce well-formed documents.
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
