It would be nice for others to speak up.

I'm going to shut up for awhile, though I would like to finally say 
this:

I think I would like to retire my proposal-for-consideration and vote 
now to keep vloggercon in mid Jan, though I do think the resolve 
would be to get to work hardcore on this now so that we can get the 
word out, get some great speakers, maybe even some sponsors if that 
is a route anyone wants to consider, but mainly start setting an 
agenda, times, dates, etc, etc, and let the world know, basically, 
whats coming down the pipeline, as soon as this stuff can be worked out.

Cheers for now!
Andrew

p.s. btw, not Amsterdam.

On Jul 21, 2005, at 9:02 AM, R. Kristiansen wrote:

> I sense a ripple in the Force.
>
> Like Baron, I see that we are approaching a tipping point, and Fast.
> Before Christmas, we will have video iPods, and already we have the
> PSP. In less than two months we will have PSP here in Norway
> (Norwegian version, not just some import from Japan via UK).
> Videoblogging will be all over the place, and these next 6 months will
> be Crucial.
>
> We should take action, but action is surely not bound to holding
> Vloggercon II in this fall.
>
> However, I agree. Yes, I agree with both sides, as represented by
> Andrew Baron vs. Markus Sandy.
>
> We have not much to lose by holding the Vloggercon this autumn, and
> neither will we lose much by holding it in 2006 as planned.
>
> However, here is my take on the current situation:
>
> 1) We need to do Our thing, without trying to control what others
> does. If the guys who 'own' the vloggercon and who arranged the Con I
> want to do it this autumn, then go ahead. Make the preparations, find
> the date, and start advocating Vloggercon II. If I can at all make it,
> I will. If someone wants to have a conference about videoblogging in
> San Francisco, they should go ahead and do it. Personally, I have
> about 3x as much chance of getting to NYC than San Francisco. The
> flights from Norway to NYC are pretty cheap, whereas SF is half a
> world away literally.
>
> 2) The vlogosphere is beginning to form a sphere with several centres,
> and I am very very happy about that. Remember how it was in December?
> Personally I would rather focus on making a European Videoblogging
> Convention than being a mere participant at an event in the US.
> However, I would of course love to attend both.
>
> 3) Overall, I am very happy about how things are moving. Yes, you have
> the FCC and etc, and there are reasons why we should fear the USA
> controlling the Internet, but we Norwegians will fight back, at least!
>
> I am positive about how things are working now. But there are ripples
> in the Force, and the crack will come soon.
>
> Let a thousand vlogospheres bloom, and let us not forget the past, and
> let us not fear the future.
>
> Just my take on it :)
>
> Greetings from Copenhagen, where I am having a 6-day vacation together
> with Johannes, my brother. He is 23 years old, but does not want to
> vlog. Damn.
>
> Best,
>
> Raymond M. Kristiansen
> http://dltq.org
> http://vlogeurope.com
>
> ps. Who considers themselves to be behind Vloggercon I in January?
> Jay, Peter, Steve, Chuck, Ryanne? Andrew, Jay, Peter, Joshua? I
> suggest those people get together, consider the options, take in all
> the facts (including tipping point condition) and make a Decision.
> Then those who feel left out can organize their own convention.
>
> There are a zillion blogging conventions. Why should we think only in
> terms of One videoblog convention? Just wondering :)
>
> On 7/20/05, ro9core <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> --- In [email protected], "David Meade" 
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> NYC is ok with me ... but it would be cool to at least consider some
>>> other places because a) there are some really cool other places that
>>> b) truely are just as easy to get to (flights = flights). and c) the
>>> NYC-centric attitude is REALLY strong here ... makes everyone else
>>> feel somehow removed, when other places aren't considered just 
>>> because
>>>  they aren't NY.
>>>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to