I like your advice. I'll adjust fire.

Jamie
thekeverreport.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I don't think its necessary... your target output is TV not the web,
> and to re-edit everything would be a big PITA.
>
> But, if your target output was the web then I would definitely say
> smaller chunks are better. Maybe even separate blog entries for each
> bit so there are permalinks to specific video segments. Of course
> these decisions would be up to you as the author, but I prefer
things
> that are linkable. The web is an ecology of links, work with its
> strength. The web is not ideal for linear media.
>
> The quoting tool is something Peter added to MeFeedia.com. It allows
> you to create quote segments from Quicktime movies. The output is a
> SMIL movie that uses the start and stop time parameters to make the
> quote. Although you'll still have to wait for the movie to load up
to
> the point of the quote before it begins playing -- this is a SMIL
> limitation.
>
> Here's an example of the quoting action on Chuck Olsen's site:
> http://blogumentary.typepad.com/vlog/2005/08/mefeedia_quote_.html
>
> -Josh
>
>
>
> On 8/8/05, jmedakev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I really don't want to seperate it. Do you really think that is
> > necessary? It flows from one thing to the other.
> >
> > What's this quoting thing you're talking about?
> >
> > Jamie
> > thekeverreport.com
> >
> >
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Why not make each of these a separate chunk.
> > > Then I might be able to watch and even link to individual parts
of
> > it
> > > rather than tell someone:
> > > "you know there's some good stuff from minute 18:30 to 21:10"
> > >
> > > (Or i could use MeFeedia's new quoting tool: plugging for Peter)
> > >
> > > -josh
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/8/05, jmedakev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > PLEASE by all means... check it out. It's about the war. I
> > interview
> > > > three soldiers who served in Iraq, one of whome adamently
> > disagrees
> > > > with the war. I interviewed a woman who's husband was killed
in
> > Iraq.
> > > > I interview an actual Iraqi citizen who says what he thinks
> > should be
> > > > done with Saddam. I call Senator Edwards out on not taking my
> > > > questions. I call Margaret Cho out on a blog post she wrote
that
> > > > makes me sick. I start my independent journalism series where
I'm
> > > > gonna teach you how to start your own news cast.
> > > >
> > > > Watch the first three minutes. Thats all I ask.
> > > >
> > > > Jamie
> > > > thekeverreport.com
> > > >
> > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Watkins"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > I like small chunks, but I really love long stuff too.
> > > > >
> > > > > Some stuff just cant be handled in little chunks, I like
epics.
> > The
> > > > > temptation to talk of legendary lower attention span in
certain
> > > > > nations is almost too much to resist, but I will try.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or do a combination. There is the video of lecture
> > > > series 'Everything
> > > > > I Know' by R Buckminster Fuller available free online, I
> > believe it
> > > > is
> > > > > 42 hours long. But it is also broken down into many
hundreds of
> > > > > shorter clips.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway there is no right or wrong, people differ, and
generally
> > I
> > > > > think anybody could be captivated for longer periods of
time IF
> > the
> > > > > content kept them captivated. Still its hard to create
> > captivating
> > > > > epics, so its more likely people would watch longer stuff
thats
> > on a
> > > > > specific theme  thats of special interest to them.
> > > > >
> > > > > To say whether the video in question should be 28 minutes or
> > not,
> > > > well
> > > > > I could not say without seeing it first.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve of Elbows
> > > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > So, josh, I would encourage you to think "out of the
Web" ;-
> > )
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can't watch anything longer than 5 minutes anywhere (5
> > minutes
> > > > is
> > > > > > really pushing the limits of my attention span), not just
on
> > the
> > > > web.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I won't watch a 28 minute segment on TV, or listen to 28
> > minutes
> > > > > > straight on the radio without checking what else is on, or
> > > > jumping up
> > > > > > to check email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't think I'm alone. I really wish maintream content
> > producers
> > > > > > would htink in smaller chunks. There are only 2 good
minutes
> > > > maximum
> > > > > > of just about everything on television or in the movies,
the
> > rest
> > > > is
> > > > > > filler.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -josh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >





YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to