rather than latitude and longitude.
The problem with location names is that they are strings and it is
faster to process numbers rather than alphanumeric characters. Not to
mention the problem with consistency (New York vs. New York City vs.
NY vs. NYC).
If you are referring to the privacy issue, you can always precisely
list a different location than your home.
I'm assuming you meant tech over privacy so here is the W3C page...
http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/
As for the "geovlogged" clogging, it currently only shows the last
100. If you start posting a lot from your house then yes there will
be a clogging issue. There are a few different ways to solve this,
but it currently is not a problem.
-Matt
--------------------------------------
http://www.leanbackvids.com/videoblog/
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Eric Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't there a way to be less *precise* in geotagging? Especially
since maps can take
> coordinates and map an address.
SPONSORED LINKS
| Individual | Fireant | Explains |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
