Then I recommend "Soreson Video" codec (export using Quicktime
conversion in Final Cut + pick Soreson Video as the codec... or some
similar thing in a different system). Use this codec, along with the
other advice (like a low data rate) to get a super pixelated look. (It
was the main codec used for the Quicktime 5 Player and stinks compared
to Mpeg-4.) The best thing to do is a lot of trial and error. There's
nothing like compressing and recompressing the same clip a couple of
dozen times while taking lots of notes about all the different numbers
you are using to get a real understanding of how compression works. It
will only take 10-12 hours or so :-)
The "best" way to get crappy audio is to compress the audio at or below
24 kHz -- the lower, the crappier. But you may really, really NOT want
to make your audio crappy too.
So yeah, like Ryanne said -- what are you up to?
jen
jenSimmons
http://www.emergingawareness.org
http://www.inclinationsthemovie.com
http://www.jensimmons.com
On Aug 18, 2005, at 11:19 PM, Adrian Miles wrote:
> around the 18/8/05 Philip Clark mentioned about [videoblogging]
> crappy-looking video that:
>> I've tried a couple of them, but I thought I'd save some time and just
>> ask, are there any of these formats which lend themselves more to
>> crappy-looking video?
>
> set a low data rate, large pixel size, and have a lot of action. if
> it is still then you just can't do it without a lot of effort. Also
> qt pro will give more control, but you want to over ride presets so
> that you drop data rate, bump up frame rate, and resolution.
> --
> cheers
> Adrian Miles
>
> hypertext.RMIT
> <URL:http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vlog>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
SPONSORED LINKS
| Individual | Fireant | Explains |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
