around the 2/9/05 Kunga mentioned about Re: [videoblogging] URL that: >While I agree the H.264 looks much better, I don't know how any of us >can offer it without cutting out most of the visitors to or receivers >of enclosures from our sites. Since iTunes only sees one enclosure >per post, we would have to make multiple posts and force subscribers >to download twice as many files as they would ever use. I don't know >the solution to this problem.
there is no problem :-) H.264 is better. If you want to use it, use it, if your audience are interested in your work, they will follow. If they don't, they're not interested. If you prefer to maximise audience (for whatever reason) then you should already be using mov and wmv and not attempting anything to do with 'interactivity', 'experimentation' or 'creativity' since each of these will force your users to do more.... or just wait, but videobloggers apparently are a vanguard. in my book a vanguard doesn't wait for the 'public' to catch up ;-) -- cheers Adrian Miles hypertext.RMIT <URL:http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vlog> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
