Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:46:34 +0200, Charles HOPE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> That's it, isn't it? I'd rather get the story from a local blogger than 
> the most
> highly decorated war correspondent. The latter is and will always be an 
> outsider.
>
> What if we tried the dictum "All News is Local" on for size. I think the
> majority of stories are local to something, and are best covered by 
> local people.

Are they now? Can the local always make the story relevant for you? When I 
want a Danish angle on something that happened in the US would the US 
blogger provide me with that?

Very cute example. But what you want is a Danish person living in the US, who sees the event from as closely as possible, preferably one who was involved in the event. As opposed to a Danish reporter who happened to be in the neighborhood, providing you with his second-hand reporting as he selects quotes from interviewed witnesses later much later.



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to