--- In [email protected], "Andreas Haugstrup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:25:43 +0200, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't see why an "angle" isn't a objective element. It's an > > objective truth of one's values, sensibilities and perspective gained > > from living. It just needs to be understood as what it is -- a > > individual system of values applied to an event. That a person has > > specific values is no less a true fact than a dog found in a park. > > As soon as you choose an angle you make a choice to show one possible > 'truth' out of many possible 'truths'. It's a choice made my the > journalists (or his editors) and it is subjective. > > - Andreas > -- > <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > > Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
And it is objectively true as your truth or perspective. It is an added element to the objective reporting of the event. There are many possible events to cover, one makes a choice on that too. It does not deny the objectivity of a single event. -- Enric ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
