Not very encouraging?  I found this to be an obvious display of
possiblity, which is encouraging to me.  230 readers is the top? 
Think of all the potential viewers out there and 230 becomes very
small.  Pick any niche market and there are probably more than 230
people who are online with the same interest.

On a bigger note, this data displays deviations in readership.  We all
see the ups and downs in our own stats and it is nice to relate that
to others.  However, I too have felt hurt by numbers.

Either way, it is just data... public data at that.  And I hope there
are more people who find it interesting than who find it discouraging.

This was originally built on a "hidden" page where only I could
consume the data, but I realized that this data is no secret. 
Personally more important was the fact that it was a fun learning
process to build a system that reads and organizes the data.  Not to
mention finding a PHP graphing program (jpgraph).

-Matt
--------------------------------------
http://www.leanbackvids.com/videoblog/
http://www.vlogmap.org/blog/


--- In [email protected], Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kinda cool, but not very encouraging to people who are starting off,
who 
> cares who has the most subscribers. that is no guage of who is
creating good 
> content. This all goes back to my first rant about popularity and
about how 
> feedreaders piss me off. this is not a popularity contest so lets stop 
> focusing on who is getting the most subscribers!





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to