I don't really give a shit what anyone really calls it. If I can just get people to understand it it and dig it is all that matters to me. If there was one word or phrase that made people understand instantly, I'd use it. I wouldn't care what it was.
Bill Streeter www.lofistl.com --- In [email protected], Adam Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/16/05, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The irony is, most people who complain about this 'defining of terms' are > > those who would indeed rant out against governing bodies who force bullshit > > regulations and the broadcast networks force feeding us bullshit news and > > entertainment content. If you dont want to eat that shit, why should you > > want to eat a nonsensical language that you decided to not contribute to > > deifning yourself.... of the media landscape that you enjoy? > > > Well, for me, because I got tired of the argument. It's not that I don't > understand the merit of proper definition, in fact I hate when words are > used out of context or absent of meaning. I just tried to bow out of this > one because I decided it wasn't worth my effort. I, and all the other > videobloggers I know personally or even remotely know, call it > videoblogging. If someone else wants to call it PepsiPodding, fuck em. We'll > still be calling it videoblogging, won't we? > -- > Q > bullemhead.com <http://bullemhead.com> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/cd_AJB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
