Well yes I agree with you. It's more about the length overall. I am going for the 1 mb/minute due to the overall length of each post. I would like to do shorter stuff too. But the Webzine sessions is a priority for the next month or so. And they are all long. I also don't want to waste my audience's hard drive space unnecessarily. And I think what I've posted so far looks acceptable if not downright good. But I do need to go back and lose the one frame per second stuff now that I have the HandBrake solution figured out instead. -- Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903 New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Webcaster, Futurecaster Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley URL http://FutureMedia.org RSS http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia iTunes http://tinyurl.com/8ql87
On Oct 12, 2005, at 4:23 PM, Steve Watkins wrote: > Is your stuff dialup friendly? Surely you'd cut it into smaller chunks > if it was. I remember one of your files weighing in at just over 40mb, > thats around 2 hours to download on 56k. > > Do you have any specific potential audiences in mind for your work? > Are they likely to be without broadband? Of all the videoblogs I see, > I didnt think yours would be one to be more concerned about narrowband > users than any other videoblogger, you are futuremedia? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
