On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:52:07 +0200, fALk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so why are you making a closed container format .mov and not an open > container format .mp4 or the now vidiPod .m4v ? Its the same > compressor and the same quality and the same size (plus minus a few > bytes) BUT with a .mp4 Operating System like Linux can enjoy you > content as well as a all the others that can enjoy you .mov also > recommendet for the vidiPod seems to be the .m4v container. All you > need to do is instead choosing Export -> Movie To Quicktime Movie is > Export -> Movie to MPEG4 - then you get basically the same dialog > with the same options just you endresult movie is a true lovely > interoperable MPEG4 and can be seen by a lot more people.
The two are not interchangeable like you suggest. MP4 doesn't support all the nice things .mov does - like SMIL, chapter, text and sprite tracks or links. - Andreas -- <URL:http://www.solitude.dk/> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
