On 27/10/05 10:05 PM, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:34:40 +0200, Mat Wall-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Well I think I'd prefer granularity for the sake of expression.
Ok. Maybe we are speaking at false ends.
>
> That's what I said.
>
>> And the word academic is not ambiguous to me and I doubt it is to you.
>
> I don't know if you academic in the way of 'as related to work done at
> universities' or academic in the way of 'having no practical purpose'.
> There's a huge difference. The first I can agree with to an extent - no
> one is doing much about this, and if it takes academics to put the
> spotlight in the topic, I don't know why that should be a bad thing. The
> second is a bit silly and possible a bit insulting.
I am research student and teach new media theory and production.nuff said.
>
>> The potential for a distinctly networked videography remains exactly
>> that.
>> Adrian's work explores that potential but I am not sure those elements
>> are
>> any more (or less) important than the short form content, regular posts,
>> syndication, and the various forms of dialogical interaction that are to
>> some degree explored by RB amongst others.
>
> I didn't say that interactivity is a requirement, or that content created
> with interactivity is automatically 'better' than content created without
> ('better' being impossible to determine anyway). I'm saying there is
> bloggy video, and there is non-bloggy video and they're not the same. I'm
> saying that there are multiple factors that make up a videoblog and one of
> these factors is how bloggy the video content is. And I'm saying that a
> videoblog with non-bloggy video is not as 'bloggy' as a videoblog with
> bloggy video. I'm saying there is this and there is that and that's how it
> is.
Oh..thats how it is..great..
>
> Personally I would like to see people trying to make more bloggy video. I
> like the web, and I like to explore how video and the web (ie. the blog)
> can be combined and benifit from each other.
Some times I get very
> impatient because I don't want to wait 10 years until regular people
> figure out that you can do more than just same old video on the web.
>
> It's not like interactivity automatically implies grandiose performance
> art pieces. Simple links to what you're talking about is a great thing.
> Whenever I hear things like 'As Johnny said yesterday...' in a videoblog I
> cringe because there isn't a link to Johnny's blog post, and there is no
> reason why there shouldn't be a link there.
>
> - Andreas
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
