Why not produce in rich text but offer all three?: * html link * text link * tinyurl
Then the user can select which one they want. -- Enric --- In [email protected], Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Agreed. > > On Oct 31, 2005, at 12:38 PM, Frank Carver wrote: > > > I'd personally prefer _both_ a tiny URL and the full one. I'm > > generally wary of clicking on a link in an email if I can't see where > > it is going. The likes of tinyurl certainly make clicking a bit > > easier, but also make disguised "phishing" attacks a whole lot easier. > > --Steve > -- > Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com > Video Blog - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com > Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com > > Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution. > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
