>From the other end of the spectrum, I try to keep my videos under 5 minutes or 5MB. Although the numbers are getting smaller, not everybody is on cable/dsl/free or acquired wi-fi.
I think that some vloggers have files that are huge because they don't know how to compress a video for other types of viewers. I don't object to large file sizes, if you have content that requires it. I fully support that. I just can't view it. Some vloggers want a certain level of video quality and that does require a high speed connection & viewers. Yet, I hold out the candle for those that can create video content that is accessible to a spectrum of viewers. There is no shame in the under 5MB game. It can be a creative challenge if you work it right. As always, it isn't the size of the tool but what you do with it. Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Share" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay. trick question. but it's in regards to the size of the > compressed mov file. does anyone have any recommended file sizes to > stay within? > > Interested in hearing opinions on this in regards to the best > codecs...and the overall size ideals. > > cheers! > share > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/cd_AJB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
