right. it's like if you make experimental film/video: it's helpful (i think) to make your work not as against something (ie "critical cinema") but as *for* something: for your own _expression_/world/people. and what i mean to say is that rather than feeling an encroachment by the "big boys", you can feel it as a moment where we can put out anything we want (which is really not the norm for "the media"), and it instantly occupies the same rung as anything else. so, it's like we're all big. really big.
-dl
--
On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
I don't think its a "take over". The space is wide open. Nothing to be
scared of. The difference between this and traditional broadcast
technologies is that we now have a level field. Just because MSM has a
videoblog doesn't mean that you can't create and distribute your own
media in the same way.
-Josh
On 11/30/05, Jen Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, since King Kong is done and the marketing hype has officially
> begun, we watching people launch a film that has been promoted through
> a videoblog for a long time now. And there are bits of people, very
> famous people, talking about the behind-the-scenes videoblog in
> super-mainstream venues. Adrien Brody just called videoblogging
> technology "miraculous" on John Stewart's the Daily Show:
> http://www.comedycentral.com/shows/the_daily_show/videos/most_recent/
> index.jhtml
>
> The videoblog, for those of you who haven't seen it, is at:
> http://www.kongisking.net/kong2005/proddiary/
>
> it's weird watching the big boys take over "our" space -- really scary
> sometimes...
>
> jen
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
--- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [videoblogging] "miraculous" says... daniel liss
-
