In the podcast from the Blogher session "Blogging for Business",
Christine Halvorson of Stonyfield Yogurt talks about how the president
of the company insisted on creating a company blog even though the
marketing department was in the beginning opposed to it:

Blogher related site
http://surfette.typepad.com/blogher/2005/11/blogher_audioca.html
http://tinyurl.com/ds29y

IT Conversations podcast of session
http://www.itconversations.com/series/blogher05.html
http://tinyurl.com/9cbmv

Stonyfield Farm Blog
http://www.stonyfield.com/weblog/

   -- Enric
   http://www.cirne.com
   Determine the Media

--- In [email protected], Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I need to learn how to speak about my feelings of commercialization in
> the media.
> it never quite comes out right.
> nothing wrong with busness and profit and money...
> what is wrong is the amount of negative influence, explotation, and
> lack of respect for the community for which a company lives in.
> but as my punk upbringing has taught me: "its not what they sell, its
> what we buy."
> 
> > Thinking that companies will push out feeds of the 30 second
commercials
> > you see on tv is a little silly. No company is that fucking stupid
(well,
> > there'll be two and then it'll backfire and there'll be none).
> 
> i meant more the spam blogs. just like a majority of email is
> spam...my fear is that youll see feeds full of little commercials for
> whatever spam 'sells'.
> 
> but as Sull mentioned, i can see tradtional companies sponsoring
> videoblogs that are entertaining or informattive.
> The Circuit City Tech Review where two cool, alternative hosts talk
> about the latest camcorders.
> 
> <snip>
> > I keep seeing this latent assumption that if a company is behind a
> > (video)blog then they don't have anything worthwhile to say. It's
just not
> > true. Of course you have to let the company know when they fuck up (if
> > they start sending 30 commercial clips out and calling it a vlog), but
> > this idea that as a company they can't make vlogs is just annoying
to no
> > end.
> 
> companies in the US have a very bad reputation for making content that
> is authentic or useful. usually they add their "image/concept content"
> to popular entertainment.
> I must look at their content in the subway car when i ride to work. I
> got to see their content on every phone booth. I hear it in the cab's
> radio between the news updates. i got to see it when i read the
> magazine and newspaper.  Their content is the TV.
> and what do i gain from their content?
> 
> i cant think the last time a large US company made a piece of content
> that was worthwhile.
> when they do, ill be the first to subscribe.
> andreas, i hope there is a turning point here and companies will begin
> to create/sponsor material that is useful.
> 
> jay
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to