please, guys and gals, let's not make this go the direction of the podcastosphere. where, in the end, a lot of feathers are ruffled over who did what at what time on wikipedia. :)
I like Garfield, I like Watkins, and I like mancheesemo. Clearly, we belong to different schools of vlogging, and surely there will be a lot of angst over who gets mentioned in the mainstream media all the time, but hey, isn't this about how we can create our own media?
personally, I don't care if you find my 10 minutes of talking to the camera boring. you are then, probably, not my target audience. is it that hard to get? :)
i don't need to boycott someone just because I might find their content boring (= unrelevant for Me).
regarding trolling and the such - personally I find a bit of disruption good. we need some disruption in any group. as long as people don't get all personal and - take each other or themselves Too seriously.
now i will go and talk to the camera for ten minutes nonstop, without any makeup, any editing, or any fancy topic. you may go and make a well-produced 2-minute show. isn't it great that the internet has space for both of us?
On 12/16/05, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Labelling is innacurate either way, troll or old boys network. People
are volitional and create their future, so a label does not define
what a person will be. But people label based on people's prior actions.
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.