I don't understand the need to "strictly define"
videoblogging except to separate individually (or collectively) produced
"independent" video from advertising trailers promoting a commercial
product (movie trailers, etc.) The independence of unfettered personal
_expression_ is key to defining vlogging in my mind.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 7:57
AM
Subject: [videoblogging] Define
Videoblogging
There's been a idea that has been promoted to not
define Videoblogging. That it is too soon, that defining it will lock
it down and constrain it, and so on. The error is that a
model, definition, thesis is required to test if something is viable.
You don't discover something by not applying a model to it, but by
testing if a proposed model accurately describes the item in
question.
The video projects that are interesting and successful
whether the highly structured Rocket Boom or loosely structured Carp
Caviar, have a understandable structure. Experimental films have
existed since Edison and others invented the technology of
filmmaking. But it became a vibrant media once Griffith found and
clearly displayed the 60-120 minute, three act model in "Birth of a
Nation". Within that clear models of genres and forms -- the science
fiction, crime (with subgenre of noire), romance (subgenres of
romantic-comedy, etc.), comedy, etc. sub-models --- resolved into modes of
film _expression_.
It is a mistake to narrowly define an art
form. To say that videoblogging is just personal diaries or citizen
journalism or another type of genre _expression_. This is like saying
film is adventure. It may be that adventure (or romantic or crime)
films are the most prevalent genres, but they are not the only genres that
can exist and are interesting. It is the form of a duration around
90 minutes with three acts that does define the cinematic form. And
it is a video with blogging capability that may be the correct model
that different genres of videoblogging exist in. That model may
be incomplete or innacurate, but it should be proposed and tested
against competing models until the correct model is determined.
Saying that no model should be tested is quite possibly a recipe for
floundering and stagnation.
-- Enric
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [videoblogging] Define Videoblogging Randolfe Wicker
-