Eddie, As of last week, the secondary producer clause was struck down (yay!). Blip.tv can't get into trouble for some jerk posting porn to their service.
I say "can't," but everyone needs to be aware that individual DA's have prosecuted (and persecuted) people for selling/providing adult material even when the material was not sold, targeted, distributed or otherwise meant for their local community. So, while the law no longer requires blip.tv to have all the underage reporting and documentation, that's no guarantee that some overzealous "porn task force" at the FBI won't decide to take it upon themselves to go after them, and the resulting legal quagmire can land Enric and all the blip.tv servers in court for years. Also, if some jerk posts child porn, Enric has to remove it immediately, even if it's not theirs. [And it'd be smart to call the cops if that happened, in case you can track down the source and fry them over an open grill.] We've been watching this very closely in my house, since hubby's biz depends on it. Check freespeechcoalition.com for updates on free speech issues in the adult industry if you're interested. On 1/1/06, Eddie Codel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems like a bigger issue is how does someone like blip or Veoh deal > with the newly expanded 2257 reporting requirements? Wouldn't they be > considered a > "secondary producer" in the eyes of the feds? -- Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vlog: http://mortaine.blogspot.com Audioblog: http://bookramble.blogspot.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
