I would be nice (if this is a favorable way to go) to use our own ratings, and not be tied to choices big media made....
On 1/10/06, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ms. Kitka wrote: > >>Ratings could be something like: Kids/General/Mature/Adult > > > > > > Sorry, but I don't think either of these tags fit all content very > > well. I think we'd need something like PG-13 or PG-16. I just think > > that David's description of Mature and Adult are too similar, which is > > why I mentioned R and X (R is violence/nudity, X is porn). Neither > > apply to Kitkast, which is why I suggested something like PG-13 and > > PG-16... it contains "sexual themes", not "graphics". > > Or we could use the Entertainment Software Rating Board's ratings: > > http://www.esrb.org/esrbratings_guide.asp > > > I'm sure there are existing systems we could use. Is anyone familiar > with what might be going on in the (audio) podcasting world in this > respect? (Or are the all just using the iTunes "Explicit" tag?) > > Pete > > -- > http://tinkernet.org/ > videoblog for the future... > > > > > > ________________________________ > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > > Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > ________________________________ > -- ~Devlon Blog: <http://devlond.blogspot.com> Vlog: <http://8bitme.blogspot.com> <http://mefeedia.com> -OR- <http://mefeedia.com/blog> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
