Even if there is a centralized site, there will always be other niche
sites for vlogs. Someday, I expect that the mainstream media will
completely overshadow independently produced vlogs on the Internet.
At that time we will have to start other sites to house our little
personal shows.
Therefore, I don't think it really matters whether it is centralized
or not... either way, the medium will become more and more spread out.
Kitka
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "niko_video" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I guess I just keep hoping that the application will change from an
> art form to a media form where we will see more video footage from
> 3rd world countries and more video that the established powers don't
> want us to see. It seems like this type of footage could reach the
> masses easier if everyone knew one place where to find it.
>
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Enric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Videoblogging is in a distributed, networked, non-centralized
> > environment.
> >
> > -- Enric
> >
> >
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "niko_video"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I wonder if the videoblogging world is better off with one
> centralized
> > > leader who has streamlined the videoblogging process or more
> smaller
> > > companies competing and doing the same thing? If you could
> design or
> > > set up the world of videoblogging, what would work best for your
> needs
> > > and the needs of the community? Also, does anyone have insight
> into a
> > > site that you think will take on that roll? Youtube seems to be
> the
> > > most popular at the moment. Will it stay that way?
> > >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
