Re: [videoblogging] Re: PORN, yes, I said it PORN.

[Paul Knight]

My only problem with a rating system is the same as if you put a Parental Advisary sticker on something, the kids are attracted to it like flies.  The only way for Porn blogs to survive is to go down the pay per view route. Thats my 2pence Paul Knight On 10 Jan 2006, at 19:03, Christopher Weagel wrote: You guys are suggesting ratings? Jesus christ. Pick up a camera and go make something, stop wasting time on children  who have assholes for parents. Chris Weagel www.human-dog.com On Jan 10, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Ms. Kitka wrote: >> Ratings could be something like: Kids/General/Mature/Adult > > Sorry, but I don't think either of these tags fit all content very > well.  I think we'd need something like PG-13 or PG-16.  I just think > that David's description of Mature and Adult are too similar, which is > why I mentioned R and X (R is violence/nudity, X is porn).  Neither > apply to Kitkast, which is why I suggested something like PG-13 and > PG-16... it contains "sexual themes", not "graphics". > > Kitka > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.