I agree. The most I would ever aim for at the moment is 720P, which is
1280x720 which seems to be what nikadigital was trying. I dont know
why that didnt work, as its also 16:9 so it should really have
distorted anything.

I dont know what the situation is like in the USA, but here in the UK
a range of 720P flatscreen TVs are starting to get affordable, and so
I expect that resolution will start to get popular for some people,
though its still overkill for many people at the moment.

Even 960x540, which most people have the display resolution to show, 
doesnt tend to perform so well in a web browser, so if the intended
target is embedded browser viewing I reluctantly advise something even
smaller like 480x270 at this point in time. For downloadable version
there will be some people who would like a higher res than that
though, and that brings me back to 720P.   


Yeah so this problem with your stuff being squashed or stretched, I
dont know what the problem is. My previous advise was to make sure
that encoding software wasnt misinterpreting the aspect ratio of your
footage, by getting confused about it being 1440 pixels rather than
1920. Maybe someone who actually uses windows media stuff could have a
better idea, but I dont know how many people on this list are doing
such things witht hat camera or any other HDV camera that uses 1080i.

Steve of Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if I'm understanding this here but it looks like you're
talking
> about posting a videoblog with a 1920 X 1080 resolution. Which makes me
> think how few people have a screen capable of displaying that.
> -Verdi
> 
> 
> On 1/18/06, nikadigital <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > next time i will try your specs 1920 x 1080.
> >
> >
>






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to