I have the Sony HC1, and for my Quicktime feed I'm using 400 x 225.
Weird I know, but looks pretty good and should handle being blow up bigger.

Sorenson Squeeze has a deinterlace, which isn't really necessary if you're
shrinking your video. I'm not sure how much processing time it adds
but I'd like to experiment with a larger format feed.

Another potential issue is the additional bandwidth of large videos.
I prefer to jusst FTP my videos to one of my servers since it takes more
time to use Blip.tv (for example), but I have to watch my bandwidth limits.

-chuck
http://mnstories.com

--- In [email protected], Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think the biggest reason more people aren't doing 640 X 480 is the
> de-interlacing problem. It takes a long time to deinterlace your video and
> it's difficult to get good results.
> Anyone out there have a good way to do this?
> -Verdi
> 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to