--- In [email protected], "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 23:40:46 +0100, Stephanie Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Well... > > > > a) I wrote a book on HTML, so I don't have a problem with it. > > b) It's not that hard. No harder than a hyperlink. > > c) I use a Blogger post template and just replace the video file URL > > when I post. Automation. Built-in. > > It's fifteen times as much code as a normal link. That counts as being > harder. You need both object and embed elements to get full support in > browsers, so you also need to put in the video URL twice. > > That main issue here it that the QT plugin will be loaded once for each > video. Just loading it once is a significant memory increase. The pop-up > is a great solution for many. It only loads the QT plugin when it's > needed. It's not perfect for everyone - I like having the player in the > same window so I personally use some javascript-fu to have an image that > it replaced by the QT player when someone clicks to play. Different > solutions for different people. My computer is over 4 years old, poster > frames or not a page with 15 embedded QT players brings my computer to a > halt. > > - Andreas > -- > <URL:http://www.solitude.dk/> > Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. >
Yes, I also use javascript to write the object+embed+href code into a div when the image for the video is clicked. This is how my videos appear on my vlog sites off http://www.cirne.com. I'm going to make that code into a Wordpress plugin. -- Enric Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
