Thats really really good news, I am hugely impressed with the way that DivX has gone from having a large number of reasons why it wasnt too suitable for videoblogging,to nearly none, in the space of what, 6 months?
I havent had time to watch the DivX videoblogs that you guys have done lately, but that was also a nice development. DivX 720P stuff is a happy match with the TV I got for Christmas too. Please keep us informed on the licensing & browser plugin release status. Thanks again Steve of Elbows --- In [email protected], "JV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > :) our free license is with our lawyers now (I know, I know... check > is in the mail). The main point is to make sure everyone knows they > don't have to pay us as well as to pass on all the indemnifications we > can legally. It is supposed to be ready before we roll out the first > non-beta browser plugin, so that means in a couple weeks. > > And Roxio does create DivX files. > > As for the AT&T thing. I don't know anything about it, but I will see > what I can find out. > > Jim Vinson > DivX, Inc. > > --- In [email protected], "Steve Watkins" <steve@> wrote: > > > > Oh dear, what is the point in MPEG-LA, who call themselves "world > > leader in one-stop technology platform patent licensing" if it turns > > out that a holder of an essential patent isnt a member? > > > > > > The stuff I am waffling about in this paragraph is > > the same sort of issue that makes DivX need to have a licensing > > agreement for people who distribute divx files on the net. The AT&T > > complication pushes back my hopes regarding timescale when DivX may > > improve their license to be more videoblog firends, but this is just > > speculation. > > > > I am not a lawyer, the above conclusions are as near as I can > > personally get without being one or having more information. > > > > Steve of Elbows > > > > --- In [email protected], "Susan" <kitykity@> wrote: > > > > > > Holy crap. You have no idea how important this is to **me** in > > > particular. > > > > > > First of all, thank you for posting this. > > > > > > Sonic is the company that just in the past year or two bought Roxio, > > > which everyone in this forum knows is what I swear by for my movie > > > creation. > > > > > > This is some pretty wild news. It's kind of comical that I haven't > > > been keeping up in the forums lately--and I stumble upon this. > > > > > > And you know? The Roxio guys in the forums there have been avoiding > > > my questions like the plague. This all makes sense now. > > > > > > Just for reference-- > > > http://forums.support.roxio.com/index.php?act=ST&f=14&t=235 > > > I was asking why Roxio 7 had mp4 support, and suddenly it was yanked > > > from Roxio 8. Now I know. > > > > > > Susan > > > http://vlog.kitykity.com > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Digital" <digitalbuddha@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > AT&T is going to go after a patent claim on some underlying > > > > technologies in MPEG-4. Named companies "infringing" include: Apple, > > > > CyberLink, DivX, InterVideo, and Sonic Solutions. Pentax and Nero > > > > already license this technology from AT&T... > > > > > > > > http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1923218,00.asp > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
