Quesiton: Is this issue about preserving an artist's intentions or is it about quality of video when rescaled (i.e. viewing at original size is perceived as "best" quality)
-Josh On 2/27/06, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree. At the very least an aggregator should default to the > original size and offer the option to go back to it if rescaled. > > -- Enric > > --- In [email protected], Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > I don't like it, especially when they do not provide you with an option > > to view the view at it's original and intended size. > > > > On Feb 27, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote: > > > > > How do you feel about aggregators or video hosting sites where you > can > > > play videos.... increasing the dimensions from 320x240 to a larger > > > scale? > > > > --Steve > > -- > > http://SteveGarfield.com > > http://Rocketboom.com > > > > My most recent post: > > VLOG SOUP: Episode 11 > > <http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/2006/02/vlog_soup_episo.html> > > > > "You are worth like 50 million danishes." - Amy Carpenter > > > > Alternative reply address: > > stephen.garfield [AT] comcast.net > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
