On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:49:42 +0100, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Until then, if you release your work under a CC license, you might as > well outline what you think it means, as I've attempted to do here: > > http://tinkernet.org/usage/ > > It's the lightnet thing to do. :) That aproach devaluates the whole concept of Creative Commons. The goal with CC is (among other things) to have a shared set of licenses, making it *easy* for people to see exactly what they can and cannot do with your content. If everyone went and wrote up a usage page saying "this is CC licensed, but it's CC licensed under this interpretation I've written below" we would be back to square one. Use a CC license if you agree with what the license says. If not don't say "CC licensed... in my interpretation", just write up guidelines without mentioning Creative Commons. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
